Posted by
Grampus on Friday, May 04, 2007 12:39:02 PM
The
anti-war activists always demonstrate here in America where it’s safe.
We don’t see their demonstrations in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North
Korea – the places that really need their actions the most. Why? They
would be killed!
The liberal Democrats, formulating ideas and actions based on human
rights, civil rights, diversity, multiculturalism and embracing
political correctness have no clue that if Jihad wins, all of these
things would immediately be thrown into the dung heap.
They have
incorporated into American psyche the “big lie” to support all of this
nonsense. Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi spinmeister-in-chief, said "If you
tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually
come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as
the State (Democratic Party) can shield the people from the political,
economic or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State (Democratic Party) to use all of its powers to
repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus
by extension the truth is the greatest enemy of the State (Democratic
Party).”
Today, we are witnessing the “big lie” strategy in action and sadly, it
is working. I am in no way inferring that the Democratic party is
loaded with Nazis, please do not make that comparison or inference in
any form. However, they rely on truth through repetition and are never
called to task to justify their lies by the mainstream media but in
reality, assists them in the spreading of lies.
According to polls, the majority of Americans want nothing to do with
the Iraq war and are calling for a situation of isolationism and
pacifism that nearly doomed us in the beginning of World War II.
Ironically, it was Russia that saved our bacon then because the rest of
the world had either been occupied or on the brink of collapse.
History teaches us that if Hitler had not assumed Great Britain as a
minor threat that could be dealt with later and pressed on, instead of
turning his attention to Russia, it was only a matter of very little
time that he would have been poised to invade the North American
continent with the assistance of Japan.
You may be asking yourself, “why is he dredging up all this ancient
history?” I bring this up to illustrate that turning points in history
are often dicey things. Now, we find ourselves at another one of those
key moments in history.
There is a very dangerous element of Islam that either has, or wants,
and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or
chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world.
Jihadists are
very akin to the Nazis in their belief that Islam, derived from the
radical conservatives of the Wahhabi (by the way, centered in Saudi
Arabia) sect of Muslims should spread their beliefs first to the Middle
East, then Europe and eventually the world. If you do not conform to
their will, you will be killed, placed in slavery or subjugated to the
payment of exorbitant taxation. It is their goal to complete the
Holocaust by the utter destruction of Israel and purging the world of
Jews.
An enormous complication overlies all of this in the
battle Muslims wage against themselves concerning who is the real
successor to Muhammed. Islam calls Muhammed the last prophet of Allah,
why would a successor be forthcoming? This is just another example of
the imbecilic contradictions of Islam. The killing of fellow Muslims
has been going on for over 1300 years and is continuously referred to
as a civil war by Western civilization.
If Jihadists win, the Wahhabis will control the Middle East, OPEC oil
and the U.S., European and Asian economies. I am very much a
contrarian to the idea that we should ally ourselves closely to Saudi
Arabia mistakenly thinking of them as educated and rational when in
fact, they are the source of Wahhabi financing and support of the
insurgency movement. It is my belief that if we focused on the total
destruction of the Wahhabis, it would remove the ability of Jihadists
and other terror groups to finance their operations and thus be
rendered ineffective. I believe our existence and survival depends on
defeating these modern day Nazis.
We are going to have to do it somewhere and it is better to do it
there, not in New York, not in London, Paris or Berlin. We have a
battle raging now at a place and time of our choosing and we need to
step up and finish the job.
We created a battle with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the
battle. We are killing bad people, and the ones we get there we won't
have to get here. We also have a good shot at creating a democratic,
peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the
rest of the Middle East.
This is not some TV show or movie where everything comes turns out OK
in the end in an hour or two. World reality is not like that. It
presents us with uncertain outcomes, usually in a way we do not want to
deal with and sometimes turns very brutal, ugly and bloody. It is
reality and we have to deal with it… cut and run, surrender, ignoring
it or telling lies to ourselves and others and swearing that it is the
truth is not a viable option. That option defers the problem
momentarily but in the end the problem will reappear, usually in a much
more dangerous and powerful form. Now Iraq is just another battle in a
very old and perpetual battle of ideas. I believe that we have four
options:
- 1. Defeat Jihad now before it gets nuclear weapons
- 2. Fight Jihad later after it obtains nuclear weapons which appears to be in the very near future
- 3. Surrender to Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East and eventually in America
- 4..Back off, picking up the fight later when they are more widespread and
possibly have won control of Europe. This option is much more
dangerous and costly in terms of money and in loss of American lives.
The bottom line is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism
until we defeat it and that will not happen with a policy based on
human rights, civil rights, diversity, multiculturalism and embracing
political correctness.
World history is about civilization and culture clashes and all wars
are about ideas of what society is about and the one most determined
always wins. Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win.
The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Perspective is individual reality and our schools teach too little
history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American
mind. Opposition to this war embraces an idea that our children or
grandchildren may live in an American Islamic society under the Mullahs
and Sharia .
I find it difficult and troubling that the average American does not
understand this. I totally reject what the Democratic party of the
United States offers as an alternative. The ambitions and goals of
Islamists can not be “talked” away. The Brits very nearly doomed
themselves believing that the appeasement tactics of Neville
Chamberlain would quelm the ambitions of the Nazis.
Grampus