About Me

Name: Grampus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The Big Lie Strategy

The anti-war activists always demonstrate here in America where it’s safe.  We don’t see their demonstrations in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea – the places that really need their actions the most.  Why?  They would be killed!

The liberal Democrats, formulating ideas and actions based on human rights, civil rights, diversity, multiculturalism and embracing political correctness have no clue that if Jihad wins, all of these things would immediately be thrown into the dung heap.

They have incorporated into American psyche the “big lie” to support all of this nonsense.  Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi spinmeister-in-chief, said "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.  The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State (Democratic Party) can shield the people from the political, economic or military consequences of the lie.  It thus becomes vitally important for the State (Democratic Party) to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension the truth is the greatest enemy of the State (Democratic Party).”

Today, we are witnessing the “big lie” strategy in action and sadly, it is working.  I am in no way inferring that the Democratic party is loaded with Nazis, please do not make that comparison or inference in any form.  However, they rely on truth through repetition and are never called to task to justify their lies by the mainstream media but in reality, assists them in the spreading of lies.

According to polls, the majority of Americans want nothing to do with the Iraq war and are calling for a situation of isolationism and pacifism that nearly doomed us in the beginning of World War II. Ironically, it was Russia that saved our bacon then because the rest of the world had either been occupied or on the brink of collapse.  History teaches us that if Hitler had not assumed Great Britain as a minor threat that could be dealt with later and pressed on,  instead of turning his attention to Russia, it was only a matter of very little time that he would have been poised to invade the North American continent with the assistance of Japan. 

You may be asking yourself, “why is he dredging up all this ancient history?” I bring this up to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things. Now, we find ourselves at another one of those key moments in history.

There is a very dangerous element of Islam that either has, or wants, and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world.

Jihadists are very akin to the Nazis in their belief that Islam, derived from the radical conservatives of the Wahhabi (by the way, centered in Saudi Arabia) sect of Muslims should spread their beliefs first to the Middle East, then Europe and eventually the world.  If you do not conform to their will, you will be killed, placed in slavery or subjugated to the payment of exorbitant taxation.  It is their goal to complete the Holocaust by the utter destruction of Israel and purging the world of Jews.

An enormous complication overlies all of this in the battle Muslims wage against themselves concerning who is the real successor to Muhammed.  Islam calls Muhammed the last prophet of Allah, why would a successor be forthcoming?  This is just another example of the imbecilic contradictions of Islam.  The killing of fellow Muslims has been going on for over 1300 years and is  continuously referred to as a civil war by Western civilization. 

If Jihadists win, the Wahhabis will control the Middle East, OPEC oil and the U.S., European and Asian economies.  I am very much a contrarian to the idea that we should ally ourselves closely to Saudi Arabia mistakenly thinking of them as educated and rational when in fact, they are the source of Wahhabi financing and support of the insurgency movement.  It is my belief that if we focused on the total destruction of the Wahhabis,  it would remove the ability of Jihadists and other terror groups to finance their operations and thus be rendered ineffective.  I believe our existence and survival depends on defeating these modern day Nazis.

We are going to have to do it somewhere and it is better to do it there, not in New York, not in London, Paris or Berlin.  We have a battle raging now at a place and time of our choosing and we need to step up and finish the job.

We created a battle with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the battle. We are killing bad people, and the ones we get there we won't have to get here. We also have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East.

This is not some TV show or movie where everything comes turns out OK in the end in an hour or two.  World reality is not like that.  It presents us with uncertain outcomes, usually in a way we do not want to deal with and sometimes turns very brutal, ugly and bloody. It is reality and we have to deal with it… cut and run, surrender, ignoring it or telling lies to ourselves and others and swearing that it is the truth is not a viable option.  That option defers the problem momentarily but in the end the problem will reappear, usually in a much more dangerous and powerful form.  Now Iraq is just another battle in a very old and perpetual battle of ideas.  I believe that we have four options:

  • 1.  Defeat Jihad now before it gets nuclear weapons

  • 2.  Fight Jihad later after it obtains nuclear weapons which appears to be in   the very near future

  • 3.  Surrender to Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East and eventually in America

  • 4..Back off, picking up the fight later when they are more widespread and possibly have won control of Europe.  This option is much more dangerous and costly in terms of money and in loss of American lives.

The bottom line is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it and that will not happen with a policy based on human rights, civil rights, diversity, multiculturalism and embracing political correctness.

World history is about civilization and culture clashes and all wars are about ideas of what society is about and the one most determined always wins.  Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.

Perspective is individual reality and our  schools teach too little history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American mind.  Opposition to this war embraces an idea that our children or grandchildren may live in an American Islamic society under the Mullahs and Sharia .

I find it difficult and troubling that the average American does not understand this.  I totally reject what the Democratic party of the United States offers as an alternative.  The ambitions and goals of Islamists can not be “talked” away.  The Brits very nearly doomed themselves believing that the appeasement tactics of Neville Chamberlain would quelm the ambitions of the Nazis.

Grampus
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive